Young, I.M. (2003). The logic of Masculinist Protection: Reflections on the Current Security State. Signs, 29 (1), 1-25. (HYoung, I.M. (2003). The logic of Masculinist Protection: Reflections on the Current Security State. Signs, 29 (1), 1-25. (Hobbes)

How to structure your review

•Introduction

•The topic of the article/chapter (tip – this is going to be, partly, one of the thinkers/topics we have looked at so far)

•The main point of the article/chapter

•Which elements you will focus on

•Your evaluation of the article/chapter in brief

•Summary

•Run through the main points in more detail

•‘Reconstruct’ the argument of the article/chapter

•What does it say about key thinkers/theories studied so far?

•Evaluation

•Overall, is the position outlined in the article/chapter convincing?

•Which points are especially interesting, relevant, or problematic? Explain why

•Does each move in the author’s argument work?

•Conclusion

•This can be short – a few sentences

•Summarise your evaluation of the article/chapter

– In addition to the main source, you should aim to use the thinkerlisted in brackets at the end and at least one other source

-Use the reference for the main article/chapter as your title

-Give page numbers,this is possible for each of the main sources

-Cite the other sources you use and list them in your bibliography

TAKE THE ADDITIONAL SOURCE FROM SATANFORD ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PHILOSOPHY

Solution

This question has been answered.

Order Now
Scroll to Top