- In Chapter 1, we read about the different types and functions of maps. We also learn about different ways of dividing areas into regions. Take a second and consider this question: “Can a perception be mapped?” For context, I’d like for you to read an article written by Shrinidhi Ambinakudige. In the article, link available below, Ambinakudige revisits where “the South” and “Dixie” are. Both “the South” and “Dixie” are vernacular regions–meaning they are not locations. Vernacular regions are regions formed from collective perception and are not formed, created, or maintained by a political entity. Perceptions can change over time, whether it is because of race, culture, heritage, or ignorance. Vernacular regions shift and alter how a region is seen and mapped. The use of the names of local businesses is one way that this article explores to measure perception and map vernacular regions.First, read the article. It is available online through the following hyperlink: Ambinakudige, S. (2009). Revisiting “the South” and “Dixie”: delineating vernacular regions using GIS. Southeastern Geographer, 49(3), 240+.Retrieved from https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A207350013/GRNR?u=mindgic&sid=GRNR&xid=982290b0 Second, answer the following question in 5 – 10 sentences. Proofread your responses. I’m primarily looking for completeness in your response.
- Ambinakudige (2009) revisits the vernacular regions “the South” and “Dixie” in this essay. Critique (or evaluate) the methods used to obtain data on “the South” and “Dixie” and the use of LISA to map the vernacular regions.In other words, is this an appropriate method to map a vernacular region? Is there a better method? Be sure to explain your reasoning.