CCBC: PHILOSOPHY 103: APPLICABLE MODULES
MODULE 4 ASSIGNMENT 4- ETHICS/CODE OF ETHICS
| General Education Competency | STATED Assignment Rubric Demonstrates the following competencies | 4 Exemplary Exceeds Expectations 90-100 Points | 3 Accomplished Meets Expectations 80-89 Points | 2 Developing Approaches Expectations 79-70 Points | 1 Beginning Falls Below Expectations 69-60 Points | 0 Non- performance in any aspect 59-0 Points |
| CONTENT (70 Points) Written, Oral and/or Signed Communication Skills-Application and attention to theoretical components, accuracy in interpretation; following directions to meet the assignment guidelines for Content | Correct meaning and application of all terms without omissions Correct meaning and application of terms to experience-identified example explanation of example to terms | Expresses all ideas in clear, well-formed sentences; makes no errors in grammar and spelling; develops and expresses insightful ideas and claims; demonstrates precise organization and coherence. : | Expresses most ideas in clear, well-formed sentences; makes only a couple minor errors in grammar and spelling; effectively develops and expresses ideas and claims; shows good organization and coherence. | Expresses only some ideas in clear, well formed sentences; makes enough errors in grammar and spelling to disrupt meaning; adequately develops and expresses ideas and claims; shows some clear evidence of organization and coherence. . | Does not express Most Is inconsistent when it comes to expressing ideas in clear, well formed sentences; makes so many errors in grammar and spelling that the content of the essay is overshadowed; is not adequate at developing and expressing ideas and claims; shows some clear evidence of organization and coherence. | Expresses few to None Does not meet any of the established Criteria for the assignment in Content or format. |
| CONTENT Critical Analysis and reasoning | In The Text, view the Ethical Theories & Terms (see below) beginning at pages 80-93, Part 5. After reading the Ethical Theories, and becoming familiar with the terms, locate via Google, your Code of Professional Ethics (COPE) for your desired, designated, or current career. As you read your particular Code fully, locate each Ethical Theory by example listed in the text via your COPE. In other words, how does your COPE reflect a particular moral theory such as Deontology and so on as listed below. Ensure you cover each term. 9.1.1 Ethics vs. Morality 9.1.2 Universalism vs. Relativism 9.1.3 Three Basic Systems of Morality 9.1.4 Aristotelian Ethics or more broadly “Virtue Ethics” 9.1.5 Deontology/Kantianism 9.1.6 Consequentialism/Utilitarianism. Explain briefly how the referenced Ethical Theories are reflected in the COPE that you selected? | Generally is precise (fully error free) at A) performing critical analysis via association to ones experience by distinguishing subjective claims and justifications from objective ones, B) identifying, interpreting and analyzing central claims, C) making logical connections and drawing warranted conclusions, and D) analyzing, comparing, contrasting, and evaluating different points of view so that higher synthesis can be reached. | Generally is effective (Competent/ error(s) does/do not detract from Content overall ) at A) performing critical analysis via association to ones experience by distinguishing subjective claims and justifications from objective ones, B) identifying, interpreting and analyzing central claims, C) making logical connections and drawing warranted conclusions, and D) analyzing, comparing, contrasting, and evaluating different points of view so that a higher synthesis can be reached. | Generally is only adequate (Issues and errors in Content impede competence) at A) performing critical analysis via association to ones experience by distinguishing subjective claims and justifications from objective ones, B) identifying, interpreting, and analyzing central claims, C) making logical connections and drawing warranted conclusions, and D) analyzing, comparing, contrasting and evaluating different points of view so that a higher synthesis can be reached. | Generally is less than adequate (Significant Issues and errors in Content impede competence at A) distinguishing subjective claims and justifications form objective ones, B) identifying, interpreting and analyzing central claims, C) making logical connections and drawing warranted conclusions, and D) analyzing, comparing, contrasting and evaluating different points of view so that a higher synthesis can be reached. | Does not meet any of the established Criteria for the assignment in Content or format |
| FORMAT (30 Points) Information Literacy Utilize APA style format and documentation for parenthetical citations and a References page. Minimum of 1-3 peer-reviewed secondary sources in addition to assigned primary source/s. Utilize library or internet peer reviewed databases to locate appropriate sources to support or negate philosophy views in Assignment & or Discussion. | Submit in Essay format (APA). Headings are required, and ensure that you attribute (Cite) your terms; Ensure compliance with APA Format: In- Text Citations (format and placement); Reference Page Correct format-Hanging indentations; Headings Bolded Correct editing to avoid usage/spelling & grammar. | Exceeds the required APA format requirements to include all aspects of APA: Cover Page with correct attributes documented (name/course/faculty/school assignment/page number (correctly placed); Abstract (indicating what the Assignment/paper presents-specific Abstract word count-250 or less-(Concise yet and effective); Primary/Secondary or Tertiary and other sources are precisely captured and applicable as support and validation for ideas presented. Sources meet the highest standards for credibility and relevance (Peer reviewed). Sources are correctly documented in parenthetical citation and on a References (APA) page in Hanging indent format or Bibliography as appropriate to the style format in use. | Meets the required APA format requirements to include all aspects of APA: Cover Page with correct attributes documented (name/course/faculty/school/ assignment/page number (correctly placed); Abstract (indicating what the Assignment/paper presents-specific Abstract word count-250 or less-(Concise yet and effective); Primary/Secondary or Tertiary and other sources are precisely captured and applicable as support and validation for ideas presented. Sources meet the highest standards for credibility and relevance (Peer reviewed). Sources are correctly documented in parenthetical citation and on a References (APA) page in Hanging indent format or Bibliography as appropriate to the style format in use. Sources are correctly documented in parenthetical citation and on a References page in Hanging indent format or Bibliography as appropriate to the style format in use. | Generally Meets some, but not all of the required APA format requirements to include all aspects of APA: Cover Page with correct attributes documented (name/course/faculty/school/ assignment/page number (correctly placed); Abstract (indicating what the Assignment/paper presents-specific Abstract word count-250 or less-(Concise yet and effective); Primary/Secondary or Tertiary and other sources are precisely captured and applicable as support and validation for ideas presented. Sources meet the highest standards for credibility and relevance (Peer reviewed). Sources are correctly documented in parenthetical citation and on a References (APA) page in Hanging indent format or Bibliography as appropriate to the style format in use. some sources do not meet minimum standards for credibility and/or relevance (Not peer reviewed or supportive of ideas presented). Attempts are made, but sources are not correctly documented in parenthetical citation and on a References page or Bibliography as appropriate to the style format in use. | Minimally Meets few of the required APA format requirements to include all aspects of APA: Cover Page with correct attributes documented (name/course/faculty/school/ assignment/page number (correctly placed); Abstract (indicating what the Assignment/paper presents-specific Abstract word count-250 or less-(Concise yet and effective); Primary/Secondary or Tertiary and other sources are precisely captured and applicable as support and validation for ideas presented. Sources meet the highest standards for credibility and relevance (Peer reviewed). Sources are not correctly documented in parenthetical citation and on a References (APA) page in Hanging indent format or Bibliography as appropriate to the style format in use. Some sources do not meet minimum standards for credibility and/or relevance (Not peer reviewed or supportive of ideas presented). Attempts are made, but sources are not correctly documented in parenthetical citation and on a References page or Bibliography as appropriate to the style format in use. | Meets none of the required APA format requirements to include all aspects of APA: Cover Page with correct attributes documented (name/course/faculty/school/ assignment/page number (correctly placed); Abstract (indicating what the Assignment/paper presents-specific Abstract word count-250 or less-(Concise yet and effective); Primary/Secondary or Tertiary and other sources are precisely captured and applicable as support and validation for ideas presented. Sources meet the highest standards for credibility and relevance (Peer reviewed). |
Rhonda A. Amenu-El, PhD-Philosophy Coordinator
School of Arts and Communication/11/2021-Philosophy Discipline