You are asked to write a report for a politician or head of organisation (government, IO, NGO) whohas little time to delve into the finer details of the issue but needs to deliver a response to a perceivedglobal problem – whether that is action or inaction. You are the adviser and you will need to provide adetailed and considered piece of analysis that will enable this decision-maker to understand theempirical and theoretical intricacies of the situation.Your report will build on the situation assessment you provided in your presentation and the feedbackyou received in the discussion. The purpose of this essay is to critically analyse the theoretical andethical issues arising from the problem and your analysis of its scope, and, secondly, to develop afully justified recommendation of action.I. Introduction: situation analysis (approx. 1,000 words)Succinctly summarise your analysis of the data you presented. Draw conclusions that make sense ofthe data to illustrate how you arrived at your findings and recommendations.II. Problem discussion (approx. 2,500 words):Critically analyse the academic literature and key debate(s) relevant to your issue: What kind ofethical, political and/or legal issue emerge? What are key conceptual and theoretical controversies?III. Policy recommendation (approx. 1,000 words)Based on your analysis of the data and academic literature, make a recommendation to a (fictional)politician or organisational leader (please specify) on how to respond to the problem. Whereappropriate, succinctly discuss alternative options and identify relevant actors and/or organisationsthat will need to be considered. Outline your strategy (e.g. intervention, sanctions, changing thelaw/legal approach, campaigning) and provide a justification/rationale for it based in the theoreticalapproaches to global action that were discussed in class (e.g. cosmopolitanism, unilateralism).