Assignment Description:

Evidence-Based Practice Guideline

Write a fully developed and detailed APA essay addressing each of the following points/questions. There is no required word count; be sure to completely answer all the questions for each question in detail. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Sources are not required; however, if sources are used make sure to cite using the APA writing style for the essay and complete a reference page. The cover page is required. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

Utilize the databases identified in the text to locate an Evidence-Based Practice Guideline, related to your topic identified in Module 1. Perform a rapid critical appraisal of the Evidence-Based Guideline by answering the following questions in APA format. All questions should be answered in detail and explanations offered according to guideline content when applicable.

• Who were the guideline developers?
• Were the developers of the guideline representative of key stakeholders in this specialty (inter-disciplinary)?
• Who funded the guideline development?  
• Were any of the guideline developers funded researchers of the reviewed studies?
• Did the team have a valid development strategy?
• Was an explicit (how decisions were made), sensible, and impartial process used to identify, select, and combine evidence?
• Did its developers carry out comprehensive, reproducible literature review within the past 12 months of its publication/revision?
• Were all important options and outcomes considered?
• Is each recommendation in the guideline tagged by the level/strength of evidence upon which it is based and linked to the scientific evidence?
• Do the guidelines make explicit recommendations (reflecting value judgments about the outcomes)?
• Has the guideline been subjected to peer review and testing?
• Is the intent of use provided (i.e. national, regional, local)?
• Are the recommendations clinically relevant?
• Will the recommendations help me in caring for my patients?
• Are the recommendations practical/feasible? Are resources (people and equipment) available?
• Are the recommendations a major variation from current practice? Can the outcomes be measured through standard care?

Be sure to include the database from which the guideline was obtained and please submit a copy of the guideline with your paper.

Your APA formatted paper fully answer each question in complete sentences.

Introduction

The American Diabetes Guidelines were developed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA), which is responsible for developing standards of medical care in diabetes. ADA is an American non-profit organization that aims to create awareness about diabetes and to help diabetes patients through funding, prevention and cure. The key stakeholders in the diabetes ecosystem, including clinicians, patients, payers, health systems, and the industry, played an essential role in developing these guidelines. The input from each of these stakeholders was taken into consideration in developing the guidelines.

Funding

The standards care guidelines for diabetes were developed and funded by ADA. One of the key roles that the organization plays when dealing with diabetes is to provide funding for research disease prevention and treatment. Generally, the guideline developers were not funded to conduct studies on the topic of diabetes. Research is part of ADA’s objectives and therefore does not require funding from outside. The organization plays a crucial role in funding organizations that want to conduct research on diabetes.

Development Strategy

The team developed the guidelines based on the recommendations obtained from clinical diabetes literature. This strategy also involved input from the medical community and ADA staff. The medical community provided significant insights into the development of the guidelines because they interact with patients in a daily basis and understand their specific needs.

Process of Identifying, selecting, and combining evidence

An explicit sensible and impartial decision-making process was used in developing the guidelines. The process involved gathering extensive information about diabetes and factors that influence diabetes management and identifying alternatives. Finally, the process involves weighing alternatives and choosing among them. Before the guidelines were published, the developers conducted extensive research on diabetes within the past 12 months. The organization has a strong commitment to research. The organization remains at the forefront of landmark research, and the findings help it to develop its guidelines. For instance, in 2020, the organization supported more than 250 research studies at various research institutions in the US to create new knowledge about diabetes and influence its decision-making process.

Considerations of Important Options and Outcomes

ADA considered all important options and outcomes in developing its guidelines. Since its decision-making process is guided by research, the organization has the basis for determining which options can help address the issue of diabetes. The organizations collected significant information concerning various approaches that can be used in the management of diabetes both I the clinical setting and in the community setting. The findings presented in the research papers were considered in developing their guidelines.

level/strength of evidence of the Recommendations

Yes. The developers have tagged the strength of evidence to show where the information was obtained. Furthermore, they have acknowledged the sources of their information and the relationship with researchers from different research organizations.

Explicit Recommendations

The ADA guidelines have made treatment recommendations that need to be used when managing patients with diabetes. These recommendations are based on well-researched studies that highlight the steps that need to be taken in the management of diabetes.

Peer Review and Testing?

ADA guidelines on diabetes have been subjected to peer review and testing. This testing has ensured that the guidelines meet detailed standards for diabetes management. Furthermore, testing has provided new ideas for improving the standards. The organization utilizes knew evidence-based knowledge reviewed by several researchers to update its guidelines on the management and prevention of diabetes.

Intent of use Provided (i.e., national, regional, local)

The developers for the ADA guidelines have provided the intent for use. The guidelines are indented to improve care and promote health in populations. Furthermore, it aims to create awareness among communities about various strategies that they may implement to prevent diabetes.

Clinical Relevance

The recommendations provided in these guidelines are clinically relevant because they can be implemented in the healthcare setting to improve the overall health outcomes among patients with diabetes. Furthermore, the recommendations focus on reducing the cost of care and improving the overall patient outcomes.

Usefulness of the recommendations in caring for patients

These recommendations can help nurses and families to provide effective care for their diabetic patients. They outline the steps that individuals need to take to manage their patients’ condition and reduce the symptoms that they may be experiencing.

Feasibility of the recommendations and Availability of Resources

The ADA recommendations are feasible because they can be applied in the healthcare setting and in the community setting. Since they aim to reduce the cost of care, healthcare professionals and family members cause them to provide care for their diabetic patients.

Any major variation from current practice and outcomes

The ADA recommendations are consistent with the current practice. The guidelines have been developed based on extensive research on diabetes. Additionally, recommendations from the medical community and ADA staff have also been included in the guidelines to ensure there are no variations with the current practice.