Instructions
1. Explain this reasoning [for the selection processor hypothesis: see pp. 358-359] in your own words. Can you think of other ways to test the hypothesis? 200 words
2. Is the selection processor hypothesis compatible with the Onishi and Baillargeon data suggesting an implicit understanding of false belief in 15-month-old infants? If so, how? If not, why not? 200 words
3. Is Perner’s interpretation compatible with the Onishi and Baillargeon data suggesting an implicit understanding of false belief in 15-month-old infants? If so, how? If not, why not?
4. Assess the reasoning behind the false photograph task. Can you apply it to an example extracted from your own experience? 200 words
then i need a 50 word response for student.