Before writing the paper i would love the answers to these questions as detailed as possible. The paper is goingto be a systematic review paper with a new assumption to be better than the other research papers. 1. What is the title of your paper?

2. Why is it significant to investigate this topic (title)? Please provide at least two reasons and
provide at least one scientific document to backup each reason.

No.                               Reasons References
1
2

3. Is there any other review paper in this area? If yes, please complete the following table
through explaining what would be the differences between what you want to do with each
of the similar existing review papers. This is only for two similar papers, if there are more
than two please extend the table and include them all. If no review paper is published on this
topic, please provide two reasons why nobody has ever written a review paper in this area.

No.                Existing Review Papers            The Differences With My Paper
1
2

4. What is the eligibility criteria for your search towards finding scientific papers which you
would like to review, considering the title of your paper? This search must lead to at least
20 scientific papers for your review paper. If there are fewer than 20 papers published in this
area, please explain why.

5. What is the distribution of the papers you have found through implementing your eligibility
criteria (referring to at least 20 papers) considering the journals they have been published
in? Please provide your answer through a visual representation, for example, see Fig. 1. in
Sahebi et al. (2014).

6. Define the criteria for comparing the papers you have found through implementing your
eligibility criteria (referring to at least 20 papers). You must provide at least two tables in
which you compare the papers you have found from different points of view. For example,
see Table 1 and Table 3 in Sahebi et al. (2014). In Table 1 they compare the papers they have
found from structure point of view, and in Table 3 they are compared from decision level
perspective. You do not have to use the same criteria, these are just examples to clarify the
question and expectations. You should apply the criteria appropriate to your title.

7. What are the future research directions that you would like to suggest based on the papers
you have reviewed? Please provide at least a table or any other sort of visual presentation to
address this question. For example, see Table 9 in Sahebi et al. (2014). You do not have to
use the same categories for presenting your research directions, this is just example to clarify
the question and expectations. You should define the appropriate categories based on your
findings.
I will also upload a sample research paper for reference on how the paper should be drafted.