| Criteria | | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor |
Content of
Review | 40 pts | In depth analysis of content Excellent SummaryCommunicates the key ideas/themes/findings with a high degree of clarity and insightsEngaging introduction and conclusion
40 pts | Comprehensive analysis of the content Adequate summaryCommunicates the key ideas/themes/findings clearly, but lacks insightEngaging introduction and conclusion
35 pts | Minimal analysis of the contentBasic summaryCommunicates the key ideas/themes/findings with little clarity or insightIntroduction and conclusion are weak
28 pts | No real contentIncomplete SummaryKey ideas/themes/finding are not providedThere is not clear introduction or conclusion
24 pts |
| Reflection | 30 pts | Demonstrates thorough understanding of the article by listing all key findings and reflecting upon their implications
30 pts | Demonstrates considerable understanding of the article by listing all of the key findings
25 pts | Demonstrates some understanding of the article by listing some of the key findingsLacks in completeness
21 pts | Demonstrates little understanding of the article with few or no key findings
18 pts |
| Organization & Development of Ideas | 15 pts | Logical development of ideas through well-developed paragraphs & smooth transitions
15 pts | Logical organization, paragraph development not perfected
12 pts | Logical organization, however paragraphs are not fully developed
10 pts
| No evidence of structure or organization
9 pts |
| Mechanics | 15 pts | Meets length requirement1-2 grammatical errors’1-2 punctuation errorsAPA Guidelines are carefully followed
15 pts | Length requirement met 3-4 grammatical errors3-4 punctuation errorsAdheres consistently to APA Guidelines
12 pts
| Length requirement is not met5-7 grammatical errors5-7 punctuation errorsDemonstrates little ability to adhere to APA Guidelines
10 pts | Length requirement is not eNumerous grammatical errorsNumerous punctuation errorsAPA Guidelines are not followed
9 pts
|
| Total Score | | | | | |